Facebook  Twitter  Youtube  ISSUU  RSS  Email

Media Contacts

UK
Dominic Kavakeb
dominic.kavakeb@transparency.org.uk
+ 44 (0)20 3096 7695
Out of hours: Weekends; Weekdays (17.30-21.30): +44 (0)79 6456 0340


Twitter

TransparencyUK Running home to catch the football tonight? Why not run the @RobinHoodHalf for us on the 30th September and keep up… https://t.co/2kldfUVbDs
TransparencyUK RT @SteveJGoodrich: New report out from @TI_EU on MEPs' outside interests. Issues = opacity, enforcement of rules and potential conflicts o…
TransparencyUK HMRC fines for money laundering increase - but still offer little deterrent against money laundering failings when… https://t.co/sR6flmtUqp

Tag Cloud

Allegations anti-bribery anti-corruption summit AntiCorruption anti money laundering bribery BSkyB Cabinet Office companies conflict Corporate Cooperation corrupt capital Corruption corruption in the uk employment film financial secrecy Governance Government health Home Office journalists Letter Leveson Inquiry London Merkel metropolitan police money laundering moneylaundering offshore tax open governance pharmaceuticals PHP police ethics Prime Minister Register of Interests Research safe havens Social Accountability Trustees UK Unexplained Wealth Orders unmask the corrupt UWO vacancies

Stay Informed

Sign up for updates on TI-UK's work & corruption news from around the globe.

Who will police the police?

Written by Chandu Krishnan on Wednesday, 23 May 2012

Update – April 2018: This blog has been supplemented as a result of further important information being received. After a long-running legal case, the allegations against the Met’s International Anti-Corruption Unit and the police officers involved that are cited in the blog have been demonstrated in Court to be untrue. In light of this important information, we request readers of this blog to refer to the notes below in order to place it in a fuller context.

Claims of UK police bribery are usually shocking enough on their own to elicit a strong reaction. Recent allegations, however, that bribes were paid to members of London’s Metropolitan Police Service Anti-Corruption Unit shock deeper still.


Claims of UK police bribery are usually shocking enough on their own to elicit a strong reaction. Recent allegations however, that bribes were paid to members of London’s Metropolitan Police Service Anti-Corruption Unit shock deeper still. One of the officers in question is accused of selling information regarding a Nigerian official James Ibori who laundered millions of pounds of public money from his homeland.

It is appalling that a shadow has been cast over what is an extremely valuable Met Unit, specially set up in 2006 to strengthen the UK’s ability to combat overseas corruption. In fact, Ibori was convicted on anti-corruption charges last month thanks to the work of this very team.

In order to safeguard the reputation of the Met where clearly the vast majority of officers are honest public servants, it is vital that Scotland Yard completes its investigation swiftly. Any persons found guilty must be sanctioned with the strongest penalties possible to immediately extinguish any doubt that corruption is tolerated.

Unfortunately, this latest case is depressingly familiar. As the phone hacking scandal began to unfold last July, allegations emerged that some officers had accepted bribes from journalists in exchange for information. This claim was reinforced in February when Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers told the Leveson Inquiry that frequent payments of up to £80000 had been made to police and other public officials in exchange for stories.

This recent case and previous allegations have greatly damaged public perceptions of police integrity. The Met cannot afford to have its reputation further tarnished. TI-UK first highlighted the corruption vulnerability in the police force a year ago but not much has changed in the meantime. Urgent reforms are needed.

First, clear, consistent and robust anti-bribery standards need to be implemented throughout the Force.

Second, the movement of individuals between jobs in the police and jobs in the private sector (e.g. private investigating firms) should be properly regulated. The general reforms urgently needed to address the so-called ‘revolving door’ between the public and private sectors are laid out in a TI-UK paper due to be published on Monday.

Third, Scotland Yard must act swiftly to root out any corruption if these allegations are true. In the long term, integrity reforms must be vigorously pursued. The police can no longer afford to leave these areas of vulnerability unrecognised and unaddressed.

 

Additional Notes

There are many cases around the world in which those who are corrupt and under investigation accuse the investigators of corruption in order to muddy the waters. The case of the Met’s International Anti-Corruption Unit highlighted in our blog of 2012 appears to fall firmly within that category. After a long-running investigation, those allegations have been shown to be untrue. Although it is a positive outcome that the truth has emerged, this has naturally been an extremely difficult period for those who were falsely accused. The senior officer involved has long been of the view that UK law enforcement agencies need proper safeguards in place to protect their officers against such false counter-accusations, and TI-UK strongly agrees with the need for such safeguards. While we hope it was clear from our original blog that these were unproven allegations, and that TI-UK’s concerns had been raised as a result of the police bribery revelations in the Leveson Inquiry, we would like to place on record our sincere regret for any contribution our blog may have made to the difficulties faced by the individuals concerned.

6601

Read 6601 times Last modified on Wednesday, 11 April 2018 10:44

Chandu Krishnan

Leave a Reply

Contact Us | Sitemap | Privacy

UK Charity Number 1112842

Transparency International UK is a chapter of