Facebook  Twitter  Youtube  ISSUU  RSS  Email

Media Contacts

UK
Dominic Kavakeb
dominic.kavakeb@transparency.org.uk
+ 44 (0)20 3096 7695
Out of hours: Weekends; Weekdays (17.30-21.30): +44 (0)79 6456 0340


Twitter

TransparencyUK "The Morning Risk Report: U.K. Raises Game on Social Impact Investing" via @WSJRisk https://t.co/bejzuHXPIq
16hreplyretweetfavorite
TransparencyUK RT @kathryn_higgs: Dr Mo Ibrahim: Transparency - in particular beneficial ownership - is one of the top 5 challenges facing businesses toda…
TransparencyUK "Corruption scandals show why leaders should highlight ethics" via @FT https://t.co/wAoD16Ug3O

Tag Cloud

Allegations anti-bribery anti-corruption summit anti money laundering bribery BSkyB Cabinet Office Chart companies conflict Corporate Cooperation corrupt capital Corruption corruption in the uk employment film financial secrecy Governance Government health Home Office illicit enrichment intern journalists Letter Leveson Inquiry London Merkel money laundering offshore tax open governance pharmaceuticals PHP Prime Minister Register of Interests Research Resources Social Accountability statement Trustees UK Unexplained Wealth Orders unmask the corrupt UWO vacancies

Stay Informed

Sign up for updates on TI-UK's work & corruption news from around the globe.

Stopping the Corrupt: What should the UK be doing to recover stolen assets?

Written by Robert Barrington on Monday, 9 December 2013

When corrupt individuals steal public funds, they prefer to keep those funds in safe havens like the UK. These funds laundered in and through the UK represent misery for millions of people around the world. But what should the UK be doing to return these stolen assets to their rightful owners?


When corrupt politicians public officials and resources-resources-business people steal public funds, they prefer to keep those funds in safe places. The UK is one such safe place. These funds laundered in and through the UK represent misery for millions of people around the world. The money has been stolen from corruption-resources-corruption-resources-health and corruption-resources-corruption-resources-education budgets, from infrastructure and law enforcement, and many other areas of public spending. This both degrades those services and removes funds that should rightfully be invested in their country of origin.

The funds can be laundered through legitimate resources-resources-businesses, property, sporting clubs, gambling, expensive cars, jewellery, art, investing in the stock market, or buying a private corruption-resources-corruption-resources-education for relatives. The funds can also be held in cash, ready to move at a moment’s notice, or the UK financial and professional services industry can be used as part of a worldwide laundering process designed to hide the money’s origins.

Shockingly, in 2011, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime assessed that over 99 per cent of illicit funds flowing through major economies and offshore centres every year are not detected by law enforcement. We think that this estimate is optimistic.

Transparency International UK research Closing Down the Safe Havens: Ending impunity for corrupt individuals by seizing and recovering their assets in the UK published today sets out ways in which the situation can be improved. We believe these stolen funds should be identified, frozen, seized and – with proper safeguards – returned to the rightful owners.

We identify three areas in which the UK could incorporate good practice from other countries relatively quickly. These include enabling more rapid freezing of assets, following the Swiss model; taking on corruption cases even when they are being obstructed by the origin state, following good examples in France; and focusing and coordinating UK law enforcement resources, such as the US have done with their Kleptocracy Unit.

However it should be remembered that, in relation to the assessed scale of illicit financial flows all countries are failing to achieve significant asset recovery. The report notes that the UK is doing well by international standards and there is political momentum behind making improvements.  However it concludes that incremental improvements to the current system are insufficient to tackle the scale of the problem, and bold changes are needed in both legislation and approach.

We make three major recommendations that we believe, over the longer term, could substantially improve asset recovery rates:

  • Consider creating a new law against corrupt enrichment. The government should consider creating new legislation that allows for suspicious assets of politicians and public officials, which are clearly in excess of reasonable expectations of their wealth, to be seized unless they can be proven to have been obtained legitimately.
  • Improve the front-line defences in the private sector. The private sector – including banks, lawyers and accountants – needs to be engaged by the government as an ally in asset recovery; if necessary, through the use of powerful sanctions to deter complicity.
  • Invest in asset recovery. The resources currently allocated to investigation and prosecution are inadequate to the size of the task. More could be done if the investigation and enforcement costs were reimbursed from the assets seized, before returning them. The UK government should explore this mechanism and develop a new international consensus on it.

The UK is well-placed to use the expertise of its law enforcement and its jurisdiction over the UK financial sector to achieve a step change in asset recovery. However, the UK, and other jurisdictions, will need to take a much more proactive stance, actively hunting down and seeking out corrupt illicit funds in order to be effective against the scale of the crime. Until then, corrupt individuals will continue to enjoy their illegal wealth with impunity, and the citizens from whom it was stolen continue to suffer.

A visualisation of some of the report’s findings is accessible here.

7633

Read 7633 times Last modified on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 11:47
mm

Robert Barrington

Robert is TI-UK's Executive Director. You can view his full bio here, and tweet him @TIukED.

Leave a Reply

Contact Us | Sitemap | Privacy

UK Charity Number 1112842

Transparency International UK is a chapter of