Facebook  Twitter  Youtube  ISSUU  RSS  Email

Media Contacts

UK
Dominic Kavakeb
dominic.kavakeb@transparency.org.uk
+ 44 (0)20 3096 7695
Out of hours: Weekends; Weekdays (17.30-21.30): +44 (0)79 6456 0340


Twitter

TransparencyUK “In Whose Interest?”, our report in July, called for a ban on Parliamentarians taking overseas trips that have been… https://t.co/f0Ayq4xqxu
15hreplyretweetfavorite
TransparencyUK RT @rebecca_vincent: For those in the UK, please do ask your MP to sign this important cross-party motion renewing calls for #JusticeforDap
TransparencyUK “The changes lobbied for by law firms in 2010 which were eventually put into law by the government in 2011 made the… https://t.co/GTHu6oE8F4

Tag Cloud

Allegations anti-bribery anti-corruption summit AntiCorruption anti money laundering bribery BSkyB Cabinet Office companies conflict Corporate Cooperation corrupt capital Corruption corruption in the uk employment film financial secrecy Governance Government health Home Office journalists Letter Leveson Inquiry London Merkel metropolitan police money laundering moneylaundering offshore tax open governance pharmaceuticals PHP police ethics Prime Minister Register of Interests Research safe havens Social Accountability Trustees UK Unexplained Wealth Orders unmask the corrupt UWO vacancies

Stay Informed

Sign up for updates on TI-UK's work & corruption news from around the globe.

Military-owned businesses & corruption risk

Written by Saad Mustafa on Tuesday, 8 May 2012

Commercial resources-resources-businesses owned by the military are a surprisingly common phenomenon which is open to a wide range of potential abuses. As there is extremely limited information on such resources-resources-businesses, Transparency International’s Defence and Security Programme (TI-DSP) has taken a first step through an initial review. Saad Mustafa explores the topic.


A significantly under-researched and often overlooked subject military-owned resources-resources-businesses (MOBs) pose a significant corruption risk within the defence and security sector. They are usually but not exclusively present in weak or transitioning democracies attempting to assert a certain degree of civilian control. However, by allowing militaries such influence and authority, the civilian government essentially weakens its position and allows the armed forces to play a significant role in society.

Given that this is such a pressing issue in countries that receive large amounts of overseas development assistance funds – Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey to name a few, Transparency International UK Defence and Security Programme’s (TI-DSP) new report provides a timely first-look into how such resources-resources-businesses are structured what some of the inherent corruption risks are, and why and how some countries have reformed their respective MOBs.

There are a number of reasons why military entrepreneurship should be a cause for concern for both policymakers and civilians. For starters when you introduce profit incentives into an organisation whose sole purpose is defending the country it distracts officers from their official duties. Second, there are significant costs to the country’s economy because not only can it encourage monopolistic behaviour it may also prevent the liberalisation of the economy by promoting cartelisation in certain key economic sectors. There is an opportunity cost as well: private entrepreneurs will regard the military’s involvement as a significant barrier to entry seeing as how MOBs will always enjoy a competitive resources-resources-business advantage.

Most worryingly of all however is that military resources-resources-businesses are usually linked to the exploitation and eventual depletion of a country’s natural resources. This is especially worrisome when one considers that in some countries the military is responsible for policing borders and inspecting what is brought in and what is taken out of the country. In Indonesia for example the military uses this privileged position to move illegally logged timber without any worry of accountability or external oversight.

All this is not to say that corruption is an inevitable consequence of MOBs. It is more that the military’s participation in the economy creates certain vulnerabilities which compromise the degree of professionalism within the armed forces and create opportunities for corrupt practices to take place.

A longer version of this article appears on the Trustlaw Governance blog.

 

5455

Read 5455 times Last modified on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 11:47

Saad Mustafa

Leave a Reply

Contact Us | Sitemap | Privacy

UK Charity Number 1112842

Transparency International UK is a chapter of