Title of consultancy: Consultant(s) to conduct an external evaluation of Transparency International – Defence and Security (TI-DS) programmatic work 2017-2020
Application closing date: Friday 8 January 2021
Approximate consultancy start and end date: 22 Jan 2021 – 19 March 2021
Location of consultancy: Remote
Transparency International (TI) is the world’s leading non-governmental, global, anti-corruption civil society organisation with over 90 TI chapters around the world. The purpose of the TI Defence and Security (TI-DS) Global Thematic Network Initiative is to ensure that defence and security institutions are accountable to their publics and subject to civilian democratic control and oversight, and that corruption risks in defence establishments are reduced.
Our revised three-year strategic priorities (2021-2024) form the core of our thematic work. These are to:
We work with governments, defence companies, multilateral organisations and civil society to understand corruption in defence, and to advocate for anti-corruption integrity and standards in defence establishments across the world.
TI-DS seeks an external evaluation of its performance against its former strategy (2015-2020) with a view to understanding its preparedness for the next programme strategy (2021-2024). The 2015-2020 strategy was operationalised through two primary grants from the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (formerly the UK’s Department for International Development) and the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In addition TI-DS received funding for projects from the United Democracy Fund (UNDEF), the UK’s Conflict, Security and Stability Fund (CSSF), the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Open Society Foundation’s Open Society Initiative for Europe. Central questions revolve around the impact of our research and advocacy, and an analysis of our past and current theories of change.
The objectives of this project are to:
TI-DS is interested in understanding the impact of our research and advocacy. The project will therefore use the UK’S ESRC/DfID guidance on defining research impact[1], to assess the following types of impact from TI-DS’s research:
Impact from advocacy will be assessed using the Centre for Evaluation Innovation’s Advocacy Strategy Framework[2], to assess advocacy impacts in the following domains:
For each type of activity – research and advocacy - we are interested in understanding what contributed to success or failure, and how this reflects the programme structure and delivery capabilities.
The key deliverable is a final report that includes an evaluation of the impacts from the prior programme strategy (2015-2020), as well as an analysis of the suitability of our past and present theories of change in facilitating our programme strategy. The final report will include recommendations for challenges or gaps in our programme preparedness for the current strategy.
We are aiming for this project to be completed over an eight-week period from between 22 Jan and 19 March. As part of the tender process we would ask the consultant to set out rough timings for the overall project.
All presentations, documents and reports should be submitted in English, in electronic form, in accordance with agreed deadlines. The consultant(s) is responsible for editing and quality control of language. TI-UK retains the sole rights with respect to all distribution, dissemination and publication of deliverables.
The consultant(s) should be able to demonstrate the following skills, experience and qualifications:
The consultant(s) should provide an estimated total fee as a lump sum or a standard daily rate as gross, inclusive of taxes and other charges.
If you would like to apply for this opportunity, please submit an expression of interest to jobs@transparency.org.uk no later than close of business on Friday 8 January 2021 including the following:
Natalie Hogg
Director – Transparency International - Defence & Security
nhogg@transparency.org
[1] Consultants may propose an alternative approach for discussion and agreement with TI-DS should they have an alternative that they deem more appropriate.
[2] Consultants may propose an alternative approach for discussion and agreement with TI-DS should they have an alternative that they deem more appropriate.