London’s status as safe haven for corrupt money contributing to “broken” UK housing market
03 March 2017, London – Billions of pounds of investment, much of it driven by overseas corruption, is flowing into London property and exacerbating the capital’s housing crisis, according to new research from Transparency International UK.
“Faulty Towers: Understanding the impact of overseas corruption on the London property market” assessed 14 new landmark London developments, worth at least £1.6 billion. It found 4 in 10 of the homes in these developments have been sold to investors from high corruption risk countries or those hiding behind anonymous companies. Less than a quarter had been bought by buyers based in the UK.
Over 40 per cent of luxury apartments in a tower on the Southbank Place development, next to the London Eye, have been bought by companies registered in the British Virgin Islands. Meanwhile 60 per cent of the new homes in one of the blocks of the Westminster Quarter development have been bought by investors from high corruption risk countries, compared to just over 10 per cent bought by UK buyers.
There is also evidence to suggest that many of these homes are rarely used. In Westminster where around 10 per cent of homes are owned by anonymous companies, over 5 per cent of properties showed an abnormally low level of electricity use, whilst other boroughs with high numbers of anonymously owned property follow a similar trend.
Duncan Hames, Director Transparency International UK, said:
“While Londoners find themselves priced out of the capital, many new homes are left unused by wealthy investors based overseas. Londoners aren’t the only ones losing out: demand for London property is fuelled by the corruption that robs public services of vital funds all around the world. Others feel the need to move their legitimate wealth here out of fear of what might happen to it in countries where corruption is endemic or has brought instability in times of crisis.”
There is a growing awareness of the risk of corrupt money flowing into London. Previously our research found at least 40,000 London properties were bought using anonymous companies, registered in countries which do not publish company ownership data. New analysis of open source data in Faulty Towers finds £4.2 billion worth of London property bought by those representing a high money laundering risk.
The public increasingly understand the role of wealthy overseas investors in the current housing crisis. 54 per cent of a representative sample of Londoners in a poll conducted by YouGov on behalf of Transparency International UK said they believe rich people from overseas, buying up high-end property, is driving up house prices. More than 1 in 5 (22%) thought international buyers were purchasing property in order to launder money.
Corruption can also impact London’s property market through its status as a prime destination for crisis capital. Large amounts of wealth fleeing insecurity overseas, often caused by corruption, is being invested into the capital’s property market.
Duncan Hames said:
“Successive Governments have come to realise that London is treated as a safe haven for corrupt money from overseas. We now need to prevent laundered money and crisis capital from distorting London’s property market. The determined use of Unexplained Wealth Orders, a new investigatory power for UK law enforcement in the Criminal Finances Bill, would show the Government is taking this issue seriously. Our research has identified at least 140 London properties, with a value of £4.2 billion, which should be assessed as the prime targets for these new powers.”
“London property should be used as homes for those that need them and not left underused simply as a safe way to store wealth. We can only solve this problem if we root out the illicit wealth here and tackle corruption abroad.”
- The Government should introduce greater transparency to the property market, with a public register of the beneficial owners of overseas companies owning property here.
- The UK’s Anti Money Laundering system should be reformed to strengthen the defences against illicit wealth entering the property market.
- Tackling corruption must remain a key priority for Government, wherever it takes place.
Transparency International is the civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption
020 3096 7695
- All polling figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1,036 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 27th September – 3rd October 2016. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all London adults (aged 18+). YouGov is a member of the British Polling Council.
- Table showing 14 developments analysed by TI-UK
(Transparency International UK does not allege that any of the developers or companies involved in these properties are complicit in corruption or money laundering.)
|Development||Starting/Maximum price of homes for sale ||No. of apartments sold||Percentage of Overseas Investors||Percentage of beneficiaries from high corruption risk jurisdictions|
|One Tower Bridge||£2,100,000-Unknown||168||76.05%||41.32%|
|250 City Road (Towers 1 and 2)||£885,000-£3,100,000||126||96.40%||21.43%|
|Southbank Place Unit B4A (Former Shell Centre)||£1,050,000-£3,060,000||79||88.46%||46.84%|
|Circus West, Phase 1, Battersea Power Station||£645,000-£8,300,000||831||85.73%||44.77%|
|City North Islington Estate||£380,000-£1,500,000||107||77.78%||35.51%|
|Manhattan Loft Gardens||£750,000 - £1,500,000||33||82.14%||9.09%|
|Market Towers, One Nine Elms||£750,000-N/A||147||97.18%||39.46%|
|South Gardens Elephant Park||£790,000-£1,500,000||51||100%||N/A|
|The Corniche, Albert Embankment||£3,350,000 – £7,300,000||7||100%||42.86%|
|The Stage, Shoreditch||£685,000-£2,570,000||17||68.75%||5.88%|
|Two Fifty One Southwark Bridge Road||£675,000- N/A||163||50.86%||25.15%|
|Westminster Quarter||£959,000 - £3,200,000||30||92.59%||60%|
| Figures obtained where available from developer websites or from other open source material|
| Beneficiaries that could be classified with ‘high confidence’|
| No beneficiaries gave details of place of residence, therefore no corruption risk could be attached|