Facebook  Twitter  Youtube  ISSUU  RSS  Email

Media Contacts

UK
Dominic Kavakeb
dominic.kavakeb@transparency.org.uk
+ 44 (0)20 3096 7695
Out of hours: Weekends; Weekdays (17.30-21.30): +44 (0)79 6456 0340


Twitter

TransparencyUK RT @MaggieMrphy: So we agree corruption is a UK issue, so why are all the deadlines slipping? Recommended read from @rose_zussman https://…
7mreplyretweetfavorite
TransparencyUK As we leave the EU, we can’t leave our defences against corruption behind! @rose_zussman writes in @raconteur https://t.co/vrtt9D9ZGo
2hreplyretweetfavorite
TransparencyUK RT @duncanhames: New @bellingcat analysis finds SLPs (UK's home-grown secrecy vehicle) used by more people in Russia+Ukraine than UK. https…

Tag Cloud

Allegations anti-bribery anti-corruption summit anti money laundering bribery BSkyB Cabinet Office Chart companies conflict Corporate Cooperation corrupt capital Corruption corruption in the uk employment film financial secrecy Governance Government health Home Office illicit enrichment intern journalists Letter Leveson Inquiry London Merkel money laundering offshore tax open governance pharmaceuticals PHP Prime Minister Register of Interests Research Resources Social Accountability statement Trustees UK Unexplained Wealth Orders unmask the corrupt UWO vacancies

Stay Informed

Sign up for updates on TI-UK's work & corruption news from around the globe.

Defence Budget Transparency: The Challenges

Written by Leah Wawro on Tuesday, 8 May 2012

Maria Gili and Leah Wawro of Transparency International’s Defence and Security Programme outline obstacles to more transparency and accountability in how countries spend their defence budgets.

 


Defence budgets are the primary tool that legislators and civil society can use to hold their governments and armed forces to account and see how their taxes are being spent. Yet the ability to use that tool is rare since most countries disclose too little defence and security spending information to their public and many disclose only limited information even to their legislatures. Accountability builds public trust in defence and security establishments and helps reduce corruption that hurts their effectiveness.

TI’s Defence and Security Programme’s latest report ‘The Transparency of Defence Budgets’ ranked 93 countries according to their defence budget transparency and accountability. The study found that only 13 of those countries score as having high transparency 20 as moderate to high, 14 as moderate, 21 as moderate to low, and 25 as low. The scale of the challenge is clear: nearly 65% of countries studied scored moderate or below.

So why do so few countries provide defence budget information to their public?

1 National security as an excuse for secrecy: Confidentiality is vital to certain aspects of public work and in no sector is this more pertinent than in defence and security. Yet far too often national security is used as a blanket excuse for highly aggregated budgets, over-classification, and as a veil for corrupt activity. Our report found that 61 of the 93 countries studied spend more than 8 per cent of their defence budget on secret items. Although protection of confidential information is important this does not mean it cannot be compatible with accountability.

2 Poorly-defined budgeting processes: Many countries are limited by the lack of a clearly-defined defence policy. Countries should develop a national security and defence strategy and make it available to the public.

3 Lack of capacity and staffing constraints: Auditing budgets can be a challenging task as a certain level of knowledge about the sector is generally required. Our report found that 33 of the 94 countries studied do not employ designated staff for these matters, and 10 do, but not the level necessary to fulfil the task.

4 Audit body independence: When the auditing body is not independent from the Ministry of Defence conflicts of interest can arise which prevent accountability.

5 Lack of civil society and media pressure: Defence budgets have the reputation of being “untouchable” because of their confidentiality and technical content. Nevertheless it is the government’s duty to make the documents as accessible as possible. Putting them in the public domain is only a first step—they also need to be simple and clear to read. Civil society can play an important role. In Guatemala, for example, civil society organisations worked with the UNDP to monitor defence spending encouraging a decrease in military spending and a shift towards a more development-focused budget.

Because corruption wastes resources and diminishes public trust, it is in the interest of any government to be effective and transparent when allocating, managing and overseeing resources for its defence and security sectors. This is also true of ministries of defence and security and the Armed Forces as the risk of corruption increases if they lack accountability in the way they spend their money. This makes them weaker institutions, reducing their effectiveness.

In the defence and security sectors certain secrets have to be kept. Yet there must be processes to ensure that the government and defence establishments remain accountable to the citizens they serve and whose money they spend. A defence budget which is open to the people, and to the legislature, and which is properly developed, overseen, and audited, is a vital tool of accountability.

4735

Read 4735 times Last modified on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 11:47
mm

Leah Wawro

Leave a Reply

Contact Us | Sitemap | Privacy

UK Charity Number 1112842

Transparency International UK is a chapter of