Facebook  Twitter  Youtube  ISSUU  RSS  Email

Media Contacts

UK
Dominic Kavakeb
dominic.kavakeb@transparency.org.uk
+ 44 (0)20 3096 7695
Out of hours: Weekends; Weekdays (17.30-21.30): +44 (0)79 6456 0340


Twitter

TransparencyUK RT @MaggieMrphy: So we agree corruption is a UK issue, so why are all the deadlines slipping? Recommended read from @rose_zussman https://…
8mreplyretweetfavorite
TransparencyUK As we leave the EU, we can’t leave our defences against corruption behind! @rose_zussman writes in @raconteur https://t.co/vrtt9D9ZGo
2hreplyretweetfavorite
TransparencyUK RT @duncanhames: New @bellingcat analysis finds SLPs (UK's home-grown secrecy vehicle) used by more people in Russia+Ukraine than UK. https…

Tag Cloud

Allegations anti-bribery anti-corruption summit anti money laundering bribery BSkyB Cabinet Office Chart companies conflict Corporate Cooperation corrupt capital Corruption corruption in the uk employment film financial secrecy Governance Government health Home Office illicit enrichment intern journalists Letter Leveson Inquiry London Merkel money laundering offshore tax open governance pharmaceuticals PHP Prime Minister Register of Interests Research Resources Social Accountability statement Trustees UK Unexplained Wealth Orders unmask the corrupt UWO vacancies

Stay Informed

Sign up for updates on TI-UK's work & corruption news from around the globe.

Asset Disclosure

Written by Robert Barrington on Tuesday, 16 April 2013

It has been striking how far and how quickly France has moved towards asset disclosure by government ministers in recent weeks, with parliamentarians to follow if a new law is passed. Striking also that when political will exists, galvanised by public outrage, transparency is not so hard to achieve after all.


It has been striking how far and how quickly France has moved towards asset disclosure by government ministers in recent weeks with parliamentarians to follow if a new law is passed. Striking also that when political will exists, galvanised by public outrage, transparency is not so hard to achieve after all.

French citizens will have different reasons for being interested in the asset disclosures: spotting hypocrisy among politicians, straightforward prurience and, of most interest to Transparency International, identifying corruption. When you can see that a person’s assets far outstrip their earning power, and they are in a position of political power, the obvious question is: where did you get the money? Of course, in many cases it will be of legitimate origin. A good example, though embarrassing, is the French socialist minister who has accrued a €5 million private fortune.

But it is also the case that such assets may be corruptly obtained, and asset disclosure helps us see when that is the case. Indeed, it is the foundation of the court case currently underway in France in which TI France is attempting to get expensive houses and fast cars all located in France, confiscated from three African presidents and their families – the presidents of Gabon, Congo and Equatorial Guinea. The property is worth many millions of pounds. The notional Presidential salaries can be counted in the tens or low hundreds of thousands. Where did they get the rest of the money?

Asset disclosure is an important aspect of transparency, but it is not the whole story. A World Bank survey in 2012 of 176 countries showed that 78% of countries have financial disclosure systems in place – but only 43% actually require assets to be disclosed publicly. It is clear that public disclosure must be part of the solution if citizens are to hold their governments to account.

However asset disclosure is only part of the solution. It is not beyond imagination that those who have corruptly stolen money will also lie about their assets. That is why we also need a longer chain of transparency that includes tax havens. We need to know who are the beneficial owners of companies and trusts registered in the British Virgin Islands and elsewhere. And let us not forget that London is also part of this chain – a chain of money that is laundered property that is bought, and the legal and accounting professionals who set up and disguise all the transactions.

The Prime Minister has announced that transparency will be one of his three key themes as President of the G8 – and he will make an announcement on this at the G8 Summit in June. We await the summit with interest.

Where do we stand in the UK?

The BBC website states: ‘In the UK, for example, (contrary to what the French government is saying) there is no obligation for government ministers to publish what they own – only to reveal those interests which might clash with their responsibilities. Interests, in other words, are public.’ 

Though I begin to diverge from the BBC’s view at this point: ‘But assets should be private. And forcing politicians to make their personal possessions public could persuade many a would-be MP that it’s not worth the humiliation.’

9135

Read 9135 times Last modified on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 11:47
mm

Robert Barrington

Robert is TI-UK's Executive Director. You can view his full bio here, and tweet him @TIukED.

Leave a Reply

Contact Us | Sitemap | Privacy

UK Charity Number 1112842

Transparency International UK is a chapter of