Please select your page

The need for reform to party funding is palpable

Written by  on Tuesday, 22 November 2011

In a report published by Transparency International UK earlier this year, respondents were asked to rank several scenarios as a possible example of corruption. 86% of respondents thought that ‘a seat in the House of Lords for a businessman who has made large donations to a political party’ was potentially corrupt, the highest score for any of the scenarios.

The launch of Christopher Kelly’s report on Political Party Finance, which recommends that all political party donations should be capped at £10,000, echoes what we have been calling for since 2006. The system is highly vulnerable to corruption – this is why UK politics has endured periodic scandals, such as the ‘cash for peerage’ controversy back in 2006.

Although the Political Parties Elections and Referendums Act 2000, the Electoral Administration Act 2006 and the Political Parties and Elections Act 2009 have lead to greater transparency in political party funding, the UK is one of the few industrial democracies that does not have a ceiling on donations to political parties. The so-called ‘arms-race’ approach to election spending, combined with decreasing party and trade union membership, puts financial pressure on politicians and parties. A high dependence on very large individual donations has resulted, increasing the risk of corruption and exacerbating public unease about donors’ influence over politicians.

A 2006 enquiry into the state of Britain’s democracy found that “there is a widespread perception that donations to parties can buy influence or position. It is clear that a system of party funding that relies increasingly on very sizeable donations from a handful of wealthy individuals or organisations creates an environment in which the perception spreads that democracy can be bought.” The enquiry’s conclusions further confirm that the current state of play impacts negatively on public trust in government.

In 2006, Transparency International UK undertook research into the issue of political party funding, and our recommendations remain valid. In the interests of reducing the vulnerability of political party funding to corrupt practice the following changes must be made. Firstly, the introduction of a cap of £10,000 on donations per donor per year to political parties – as recommended by Christopher Kelly – must be introduced. We also recommend a lower ceiling (compared to the current one of £19 million) on overall election spending by parties at the national level.

Change is needed. Will the three main parties honour their manifesto commitments to reform party funding? Or perhaps we will be forced to wait for yet another scandal.

Additional Info

  • View by Topic: UK Corruption (All)
Read 1012 times Last modified on Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:34

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Stay Informed

Sign up for updates on TI-UK's work & corruption news from around the globe.


TransparencyUK Ain’t no party like a #lobbying party? @McCoolingtons asks: What will it take for politicians to address the damage?
TransparencyUK On the blog: How should we prosecute #bribery in the UK? By @TIukED #SFO #BriberyAct
TransparencyUK Small #Bribes, Big Problems: What’s a Company to Do? @srubenfeld in @WSJRisk

Contact Us | Sitemap

UK Charity Number 1112842

Transparency International UK is a chapter of


Please login using your credentials recived by email when you register.

Forgot your password? |  Forgot your username?


Register now

I'm a small Introtext for the Register Module, I can be set in the Backend of the Joomla WS-Register Module.

  or   Login